In my previous post, I showed how the essence of heresy is to resolve a biblical paradox in one direction or the other in order to satisfy the human need for a consistent rational explanation of things; and how the early church, on the contrary, used reason not to resolve or dismiss paradox and mystery, but rather to protect it. Examples included the writings of Irenaeus, Gregory Nazianzen, and Gregory of Nyssa against heresy (protecting the essentially paradoxical nature of the whole Gospel message), and the “four fences” of the Chalcedonian Definition (protecting the paradox that Jesus was both fully God and fully human).
Now we move to the medieval period for two more examples of this use of reason to protect, rather than resolve or dismiss, the paradox and mystery at the heart of Christian theology – that is, the Incarnation.
The first example is the doctrine of transubstantiation, promulgated at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. This explanation of how the Eucharist “works” extends the Chalcedonian explanation that one person (Christ) can indeed be both 100% God and 100% human, to a nuanced piece of (Aristotelian) scientific reasoning on how the same sort of “this and also that” reality can be true of the Eucharistic elements. In other words, transubstantiation tried to explain, in terms accessible to scientific reason, how Jesus’ words “This is my body, this is my blood” can possibly be true.
The second example comes from the teachings of Anselm of Canterbury and Peter Abelard, both of whom we’ve already met, and looks at their reasoned explanations of the bloody scandal that was the Crucifixion. Why on earth would God have to redeem his human creatures in such a bizarre and painful way? If you’re a thoughtful Christian or a thoughtful non-Christian considering the claims of the Christian faith, then you’ve likely wondered this yourself. Again, Anselm and Abelard used forms of reasoned explanation that made good sense in their cultural contexts to explain this paradox: God died.
In other words, the divine Being who “has His own being in Himself” ceased, as all creatures do, to be! Anselm and Abelard, both brilliant dialecticians, both refused to use reason (in the mode of the early heretics) to flatten this paradox in one direction (Jesus was not really human and thus God did not really die–the docetist heresy) or the other (Jesus was not really God, and thus God did not really die–the Arian heresy). Instead, each used cultural materials to protect that central mystery while offering reasonable explanations for why the God the Second Person of the Trinity found it necessary to die on the cross–the ultimate Being submitting, however temporarily, to death, just like a sinful human.
Here’s how I work all of this out in the “theology chapter” of Getting Medieval with C S Lewis: Continue reading
Thanks for visiting my historical playground!
This blog contains over 720 posts as of Oct 2020 (also over 518,000 views from 210,000 unique visitors since inception in June 2010). If you read something you like, odds are there are at least one or two other posts dealing with similar topics. Which is why there’s a search box right below this message. :)
Find posts by search term(s)
my book
Follow “gratefultothedead” on www.twitter.com:
- Is work irredeemably secular? – part I gratefultothedead.com/2022/07/01/is-… 27 minutes ago
What folks are reading most lately
- A few more accessible, fully illustrated, scholar-written resources on faith and science!
- Is work irredeemably secular? - part I
- Quote of the day: "Scripture is like a river . . . broad and deep, shallow enough here for the lamb to go wading, but deep enough there for the elephant to swim."
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part VII (final)
- C S Lewis's spiritual formation: confession, purgatory, Mary, and other Catholic dimensions
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part VI
-
What we’ve been talking about lately
- Is work irredeemably secular? – part I
- A few more accessible, fully illustrated, scholar-written resources on faith and science!
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part VII (final)
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part VI
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part V
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part IV
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part III
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part II
- Christian foundations of science and technology innovation, part I
- Our earthly jobs, in light of the doctrines of creation and incarnation, pt. IV (conclusion)
- For the professors: are we at the “faith (spirituality) and work moment” in academe?
- Things Medieval – a podcast conversation with Dr. Grace Hamman
- Our earthly jobs, in light of the doctrines of creation and incarnation, pt. III
- Our earthly jobs, in light of the doctrines of creation and incarnation, pt. II
- Our earthly jobs, in light of the doctrines of creation and incarnation, pt. I
- Why we need scholarship on flourishing
- Christian humanism as foundation for the faith and work conversation, part IV (final part)
- Christian humanism as foundation for the faith and work conversation, part III
- Christian humanism as foundation for the faith and work conversation, part II
- Worth reading: Christian humanist/medieval “retrievalist” Remi Brague
Comments
Blogroll
- A Holy Renaissance
- Above Every Name
- Andy Rowell
- Christian History magazine
- Christian intel daily
- Christian thought & culture (Kyle Roberts)
- Christianity & Western Civilization: The Radio Show
- Cloud of Witnesses
- Cole Matson: The Unicorn Triumphant
- Don Merritt's LifeReference blog
- Here I Walk
- History Makers
- Jesus Radicals
- Magdalena Perks: Anglicans, Plain
- Medieval History Geek
- Michael Cline–Recliner Ramblings
- Reclaiming the mind
- Religion in American History
- scientia et sapientia
- Scot McKnight–Jesus Creed
- Stand Fast in Faith
- Steve Gertz "All Things Halal"
- Tea at Trianon
- The birdseed desk
- The Christian Humanist
- The Discarded Image
- The History of the (Whole) World
- The MacLaurin Institute
- The Neff Review
- The Pietist Schoolman
- The Scriptorium Daily
- Theology PhD Mom
- Tony Siew–Revelation is real
- Travis Lambert
- Trevin Wax
Historically delicious sites
my book
Browse a category with this dropdown list
- African-American Christianity Anglicanism apologetics Aristotle asceticism Augustine Augustine of Hippo Authorized King James Version Benedict of Nursia Bible black church Boethius Catholic Church Charles Williams Christian history Christian History magazine Creation CS Lewis C S Lewis Dante Alighieri Dorothy L Sayers Dorothy Sayers Early Christianity early church economics education embodiedness embodiment emotion ethics Eucharist evangelicalism faith and reason Francis of Assisi G K Chesterton Gregory the Great healing hospitals Incarnation John Wesley Jonathan Edwards J R R Tolkien literature Martin Luther medicine Medieval Methodism Middle Ages missions monasticism morality moral philosophy Moravianism Pentecostalism philosophy Pietism poverty Protestantism Roman Catholicism sacramentalism sacramentality sanctification scholasticism science scientific revolution sex sin social justice Spirituality Theology the poor Thomas Aquinas Tradition vocation work
Month-by-month archives
Blog Stats
- 534,771 hits
We share with all the saints one Lord
Francis of Assisi--part of an altarpiece by Bartolomeo Vivarini, in the Brooklyn Museum
From a mid-15th-century Dutch prayerbook: Saint James the Great; Saint Joseph; Saint Ghislain, abbot of St Ghislain, near Mons; Saint Eligius; Saint Ermes (Hermes)
Gregory the Great and St. Mamertinus, from a 14th-century French translation of Jacobus de Voragine, Legenda aurea
Cologne Cathedral
The clocktower of the Saint-Leu-Saint-Gilles church in Saint-Leu-la-Forêt (Val-d'Oise), France
Masaccio, Crucifixion, 1426 (Naples, Museo Nazionale di Capodimonte); the blonde figure is Mary Magdalen
Door of Tewkesbury Abbey cloister